Two patterns, confusing labels
Two examples. Noah has been with Elif for four months. It’s going well, they laugh a lot. Then Elif suggests traveling together in the summer, and Noah feels his chest tighten. He gives a vague answer, is suddenly very busy on the weekend and all at once finds that she talks pretty loudly on the phone. His friends say: “Classic commitment issues.”
Mira, on the other hand, checks her phone for the third time that evening. Her girlfriend Jana hasn’t texted since noon. Mira knows Jana has a long day at work, and still her thoughts are circling: Has she lost interest? Was I too clingy yesterday? In everyday language, you’d say Mira has a fear of abandonment.
In attachment research, the labels can trip you up. There, Mira is the one with high attachment anxiety, even though the term sounds like it would fit Noah. Noah’s pattern is called attachment avoidance.
| What people say in everyday life | What research says | |
|---|---|---|
| Pulling back when things get serious | fear of commitment, commitment issues | attachment avoidance |
| Worry about being left | fear of abandonment | attachment anxiety |
Both ways of talking are fine. You just need to know who’s speaking. A self-help book that promises to help you “get over your commitment issues” almost always means Noah. An attachment style test that shows you a high score for “attachment anxiety” almost always means Mira.
Where the confusion comes from
Everyday phrases like “fear of commitment” or “commitment phobia” come from ordinary language, not from research. They simply mean being afraid to commit. Anyone who never stays long, won’t commit and disappears when there’s too much closeness quickly gets the label. And because “attachment anxiety” sounds a lot like being anxious about getting attached, many people assume it means the same thing.
Research came at it from a different direction. In the late 1990s, Kelly Brennan, Catherine Clark and Phillip Shaver collected 323 questions from almost all the attachment questionnaires in use at the time and had more than a thousand students answer them. When they analyzed which answers belonged together, two basic factors remained. They called one “anxiety” and the other “avoidance.” Today they’re usually called attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance.
Attachment anxiety in the research sense asks: “Am I worth staying with?” Attachment avoidance asks: “Is it safe to rely on others?” The two axes are independent of each other. Everyone has a score on both.
How to tell which one is stronger for you
The simplest question is: When your attachment system kicks in, does it pull you more toward the other person or more away from them?
More toward, so fear of abandonment (in research terms: high attachment anxiety):
- A missing reply occupies you for hours.
- You notice small changes in tone immediately and read them as being against you.
- After a fight, you quickly fear that now it’s all over.
- You need a lot of reassurance, and it only lasts a short while.
- You often wonder whether you’re enough.
More away, so fear of closeness (in research terms: high attachment avoidance):
- After a particularly lovely evening, you need distance the next day.
- When someone talks about the future, you feel hemmed in.
- Talking about feelings feels uncomfortable, and you’d rather solve problems on your own.
- Suddenly little things bother you about someone who felt close just a moment ago.
- You’ve said “I’m not ready for anything serious right now” more than once.
You don’t have to recognize everything. It’s enough to notice which direction you usually get pulled in under pressure.
And if you know both?
Then you’re not confused, you’re fairly typical of a third pattern. In 1991, psychologist Kim Bartholomew noticed that there are two ways of avoiding closeness. Some people avoid it because they feel self-sufficient and don’t need others. Others avoid it because they’re afraid of being hurt: they want closeness and still keep it at a distance. This second group is high on both axes and is called fearful-avoidant.
To be honest, the everyday label “commitment issues” often describes exactly these people: they fall in love quickly, and when things get serious, the panic sets in. It’s no coincidence that so many people nod along to both terms.
Not boxes, but two dials
It’s tempting to sort people: the ones with fear of abandonment here, the ones with commitment issues there. In 2015, Chris Fraley and colleagues used a statistical method designed for exactly this purpose to test whether such true types exist. The result: attachment runs on a continuum, a bit like height. There’s no sharp line beyond which someone is “anxious” or “avoidant.”
That’s why the image of two dials is more helpful. One determines how loud the worry about the relationship is. The other, how strong the urge for distance is. For most people, both sit somewhere in the middle, with a tendency. And the setting can be a little different depending on the relationship: many people are fairly relaxed with friends and noticeably more restless in love.
Two responses to the same fear
As different as Noah and Mira seem, at the core it’s about the same thing for both: an ancient protective system meant to secure closeness. Mario Mikulincer and Phillip Shaver describe how, under threat, this system gets turned either up or down.
For Mira, it gets turned up. Research calls this hyperactivation: staying watchful, asking, holding on. For Noah, it gets turned down, which is called deactivation: playing down feelings, staying busy, creating distance.
The word “fear” fits both, by the way. Avoidantly attached people often seem calm, but that doesn’t mean nothing is going on. Mary Dozier and Roger Kobak interviewed young adults about their childhood while measuring their skin conductance, a sign of inner tension. Those who strongly played down their feelings in the conversation showed a clear rise during the difficult questions. In their heads it was: “It wasn’t that bad.” Their bodies said something else.
So if you love someone like Noah: his withdrawal is rarely indifference. And if you are Noah: the fact that closeness makes you feel hemmed in doesn’t mean you don’t want it. You’ll find more on the page about the avoidant attachment style.
Keep readingAvoidant attachment style: how to recognize it, in yourself and in othersWhat helps in each case
Because the two patterns pull in opposite directions, different things help.
If fear of abandonment is stronger for you
- Name the alarm. An inner sentence like “My attachment system is kicking in right now” sounds trivial, but it works. Matthew Lieberman and colleagues found that the amygdala, a kind of alarm center in the brain, was less active when people put a strong feeling into words.
- Calm down first, then act. Breathe out slowly, step outside for a moment, wait twenty minutes before you text again.
- Say what you want directly. “I get restless when I don’t hear anything for a long time. A quick ‘I’m swamped’ helps me a lot” works better than five messages.
More on the page about the anxious attachment style.
If fear of closeness is stronger for you
- Announce the distance. “I need some time for myself tonight, tomorrow I’ll be fully back” is something completely different from silently disappearing.
- Stay a few breaths longer. When closeness makes you restless, don’t get up right away. Wait three breaths and then decide.
- Take in good moments deliberately. Sarah Stanton, Lorne Campbell and Jennifer Pink found something encouraging: on days with more positive experiences in the relationship, avoidantly attached people in particular were noticeably more satisfied, more so than less avoidant people. So good closeness has a strong effect precisely where it’s hard.
What neither term is
Neither fear of abandonment nor fear of closeness is a diagnosis. They’re common patterns that once made sense and can change. That’s why the label “incapable of commitment” almost never fits. Avoidantly attached people want closeness just as much, they’ve just learned that it’s safer to need nothing. And anxiously attached people aren’t “too needy,” their alarm is just finely tuned.
If your fears occupy you so much that your sleep, work or friendships suffer, though, or if you often feel desperate, it’s worth seeing a professional. In Switzerland, you can find psychotherapists through psychologie.ch, for example. If you’re in a very bad place right now: in Switzerland, Die Dargebotene Hand (143) is there around the clock. Elsewhere, contact your local crisis line or emergency number.
Keep readingCan you change your attachment style?


